
Originally Posted by
VX KAT
Dang, can't find the thread about Premium yielding greater MPG...I recall somebody had done a pretty long term test and was posting the results that supported it.
I've read several of the threads you linked above. I don't know which link it is, but there is a long-running thread about which octane do you use. In it, I'm fairly certain the conclusion was that lower octane normally created better power.
Because higher octane fuels contain additives that "retard" detonation, they also slow the flame-front. In real terms, that's the speed of combustion. FWIW, the best [cylinder] chambers are the ones where the fuel is squeezed into the smallest ball -- so the detonation creates the fastest flame-front.
One of the posters in the octance thread talked about using 85-octance -- which most of us haven't ever seen. For similar reasons in my paragraph above, it was shown that lower octane created better power -- because it burns faster.
With high-compression engines you don't want the detonation (created by the higher cylinder pressures), so the fuel has to be "de-tuned" to avoid pre-mature explosion. The end result is you still can make more power with high-compression and high-octane, but you also should use the lowest octane necessary to avoid detonation. It provides the best power/efficiency and the lowest fuel cost.
100% gasoline (that's still available in a few 91-octane stations) will improve MPG. But I'm doubtful it raises MPG's enough to offset the extra cost/gallon. (Gasoline has more BTUs (power) than ethanol -- which is why it provides better mpg. I believe it's only in the 3-5% range [more powerful] but the cost can be more than 3-5% higher.)
2001 Ebony VX and 1989 Custom 383 Corvette