scared meself!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ldub

I'm sorry, but if calling you the smartest guy in the room is considered an "accusation"...I might as well be speaking Klingon...we are unable to communicate on a level I can comprehend...again, sorry :flower:

It's me, not you

---

Try to deny it now all you want Dub, but we both know that's what you were suggesting I believed about myself when you made the following comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ldub

- You are just that much mentally superior to everyone you come in contact with. Whether it be here on the forums, at work, rest, or play...I'm sure you've noticed it, but are far too humble to admit it, even to yourself.

---

And something else we both know (although maybe aren't aware of in your case) is what you're suggesting every time you make your comments about not comprehending what we're talking about. It's obvious you're simply playing to certain members of the audience who you know agree with you, but it doesn't seem like you've considered the fact that in doing so, you're implying that you and those who agree with you are the smartest guys/girls in the room.

Funny how that works out sometimes isn't it. :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tom4bren

Troll-ekkie,

Apparently I've been giving you more credit than you deserve. I erroneously assumed that since you'd vectored yourself so intimately into the subject that you might have some valuable insight. On that point I was embarrasingly wrong (yes, I can admit it). It's now obvious that you neither have the knowlege base or the social skills to continue the conversation in an adult manner. You should consider your juvenile diatribe an embarrasing mental deficiency rather than a means of obtaining your perverted jollies. I feel sorry for you & unlike the whore jockey, I hope I never meet you face to face.

---

Of course, another possibility is that you don't want to consider the insight I've already provided "valuable" because it wasn't in agreement with what you wanted to hear...and your REACTION...has been to ascribe all of the things to me that you've just said in an effort to deflect attention away from the fact that you simply didn't understand (or want to accept) my answers to your questions.

The answers to the questions you keep repeating are still there, you just don't like them because they've resulted in this thread illustrating that it's actually you who has the various "deficiencies" you've just described.

So call me a troll if it makes you feel better, but someone who was trolling you would have never given you ANY answers to your questions, and the fact of the matter is that I have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

Of course, another possibility is that you don't want to consider the insight I've already provided "valuable" because it wasn't in agreement with what you wanted to hear...and your REACTION...has been to ascribe all of the things to me that you've just said in an effort to deflect attention away from the fact that you simply didn't understand (or want to accept) my answers to your questions.

The answers to the questions you keep repeating are still there, you just don't like them because they've resulted in this thread illustrating that it's actually you who has the various "deficiencies" you've just described.

So call me a troll if it makes you feel better, but someone who was trolling you would have never given you ANY answers to your questions, and the fact of the matter is that I have.

---

You sir, have a terminal case of fecal hoarding.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

Try to deny it now all you want Dub, but we both know that's what you were suggesting I believed about myself when you made the following comment.


And something else we both know (although maybe aren't aware of in your case) is what you're suggesting every time you make your comments about not comprehending what we're talking about. It's obvious you're simply playing to certain members of the audience who you know agree with you, but it doesn't seem like you've considered the fact that in doing so, you're implying that you and those who agree with you are the smartest guys/girls in the room.

Funny how that works out sometimes isn't it. :p

---

oh yeah...absolutely...It's hilarious...:laughing:

And I figured out whats wrong with me (not you)...I niether comprehend, nor speak, in SPIN.

Mebbe one of my largest shortcomings, is the fact that I gave up on "I know you are, what am I", as an intelligent reply to anything, when I was about 8 or 9. Fleshing out that old saw with more & larger words, gives it no more value than it had in grade school.

My best guess is that you were the kid getting ganged up on & bullied...and rather than taking a moment to reflect upon what might be the reason as why that would be happening, you took a belligerent little turd ball attitude which you carry around to this day...nice chip ya got there...:yesgray:

E-N-J-O-Y !

again...It's everyone ELSE...not YOU...:yes:

Oh, BTW...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

So call me a troll if it makes you feel better, but someone who was trolling you would have never given you ANY answers to your questions, and the fact of the matter is that I have.

---

There have been several attempts made, using the best methods known to modern man, (like actually reading whats in print, right in front of us) and you have NOT given any kind of rational answer to the question...no one else can see ANYTHING that resembles the answer you claim to have provided us with.

And THAT, is how I came to the conclusion that you are just THAT much smarter than all the rest...put together... B-R-A-V-O !!!... :dance:

FWIW, when you posted well wishes to Jim, I actually thought that you might have some redeeming qualities. I thought that if I tried to temper my replies to you with that understanding, in an effort to maybe, just maybe, get along with you, that you might pick up on that & respond in kind.

See there....I was WRONG again...:slap:

It's DEFINITELY me...NOT you...:luck:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VX KAT

They're not all cliques TREK, it's just that sometimes Group A agrees on the same "things", sometimes a few from Group B may agree with Group A, Some from Group C may agree with something said in Group A and B....etc, etc..... There's almost an infinite number of configurations of "groups".

The fact that there appears to be a pretty good number of folks that don't share your opinions in this thread, is just another random collection of members that I'll call a "group", that happen to share the same opinion on this particular topic or comments....that does not make them a clique.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

The problem with your logic is that there is also a random collection of members that DO happen to share my opinion. Just because they choose not to voice that opinion publicly (for good reason) doesn't automatically mean you can assume they don't exist.


Once again, it could be said that you're simply (and conveniently) directing your suggestion to the wrong person/people.

---

BTW, your response back on 1/25/14 (11:15am) in post #244 is incorrect and has flawed logic.
That's one way to look at it, and convenient for you I might add, as I never excluded, dismissed, omitted or otherwise failed to acknowledge any "group". In fact, I was quite specific to say there was an almost infinite number of "groups", which, by definition would mean your "random collection of members that DO happen to share your opinion" is included.

Just remember, you said that TREK, I didn't. (Not the first time some of you here have tried to put words in my mouth though.)
Interesting that that's where YOU went with that. You believing it doesn't make it a reality.
Is it simply and conveniently that you don't understand, what I said?
It could be viewed that you're simply trying to cloud the issue.
It would be entirely understandable why YOU wouldn't understand my post.

I don't want to, once again, simply and conveniently, be blamed for YOU not understanding my post.
You SERIOUSLY still don't understand? From you I usually expect nothing more though.
I hope you don't think I'm just trying to save face here or grabbing at straws or conveniently changing the question.

Once again, I could explain what I've said since you're proving yourself unable to follow along...
I can explain that to you, but I can't understand it for you too.
I sure hope, once again, I'm not simply (and conveniently) directing this to the wrong person. :p;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tom4bren

You sir, have a terminal case of fecal hoarding.

---

http://www.pic4ever.com/images/25r30wi.gifhttp://www.pic4ever.com/images/funny.gif

You are a real piece of work TREK IMHO.....Your self-aggrandizing rants and writings, delusions of grandeaur, and paranoid musings, are IMHO simply... sad....that's all....sad.



.

http://www.vehicross.info/gallery/data/500/Barney.jpg

OK, this IS one I'll explain...but just this once. I've wasted enough time in this thread as it is.

If it appears that I find it easy to ignore the majority of the juvenile comments coming from some of you and not take them personally, it's because I know for a fact that you're not actually talking to me the majority of the time.

The person you're usually being condescending to, insulting, threatening, calling "wrong", etc, is some imaginary person you've made up in your own mind based on all of the things in the past that YOU have either misinterpreted, or suggested all by yourself that I've said, done, etc...or in other words...the words that YOU have tried to put into my mouth...exactly like Dub was just trying to do.

Take this thread for instance, Tom proved HIMSELF wrong a few times towards the beginning...and even admitted to it after his error was pointed out by SOMEONE OTHER THAN ME. But did he stop there with me? Hardly. Because here we are with him STILL trying to push a bad position, and with posts like Kat's, where she's dissecting logic to such a degree it's as if she apparently thinks she's having her discussion with some sort of computer...or who knows what. (I'm curious, is it just because I can string a few words together with decent grammar and sentence structure? Is that why some of you start going to varying extremes with the responses you direct at me...like either talking MORE like a hick to try to make me look more like a "brain"...or breaking out the big ol' "long-haired" words like "esoteric" that you hardly EVER use otherwise? :p )

Well I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to some of you, but while it's become obvious that it makes YOU feel better to view me in those ways, that feeling that you get when you do it simply isn't based on anything real.

By all means though, enjoy that feeling in those giddy fleeting moments when you think you've actually proven that what you're imagining and saying about me is true, but when that moment is over, you get back to reality, and discover once again that the person you were just being condescending to, insulting, threatening, calling "wrong", etc, is someone you made up in your own mind all by yourself based on your own misinterpretations, denials, etc...just remember that the only person you have to blame for that feeling you're feeling not being real is you.

I actually saw a movie on Netflix recently that had quite a few examples of people believing in their own such made-up distortions of actual events. It's called Another Happy Day. Reminded me a lot of this place actually. ;)

I'd excused myself from this ramble a while ago.....
But.. ..this one I gotta chime in on!

IMO.. this shows EXACTLY how removed from reality you are trekker...

""and with posts like Kat's, where she's dissecting logic to such a degree
it's as if she apparently thinks she's having her discussion with some sort of computer...or who knows what.""


WOW!!
You sir, as can clearly be seen with even a cursory glance...

...are the KING of "dissecting".... "to such a degree"

Multiple cut and paste 'quote' efforts , combined with multiple long winded validations..
....combined with YOUR never ending questioning of what people 'really' mean..and then telling them !!!!

And...youre a champ at "putting words" in others mouths!

And even when using words that any person, with a self professed ability to..
"" string a few words together with decent grammar and sentence structure""

...you STILL find fault.
Seemingly, it never occurred to you that that was a tip of the hat to someone with your
( as you say...) 'decent' grasp of the english language.....

.... of course not..you jump immediately to a combative stance :_brickwal


You wont agree..thats a given :p

If a majority does agree, they are all, in various ways wrong..
...or a mob, reflecting a mob mentality!!

Did it escape your notice that Kats post was almost entirely ..YOUR WORDS, quotes from YOU!!! ???
And yet you attacked them... effectively attacking yourself ... ;)

I have never seen a more blatant and hypocritical display of projection and denial.....
...as you so copiously furnish all with :eek:




And that Trekker, is indeed truly esoteric...



Done...have at it, as is your bent.

Jo
.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JoFotoz

Did it escape your notice that Kats post was almost entirely ..YOUR WORDS, quotes from YOU!!! ???
And yet you attacked them... effectively attacking yourself ... ;)

---

That pretty much sums it up...he's blathered (talk long-windedly, without making very much sense), pontificated (express one's opinions in a way considered annoyingly pompous and dogmatic), bloviated(talk at length, esp. in an inflated or empty way), & SPUN to such a degree, that he's unable to recognize his own rudimentary sentence structures...unless they're presented in a quotation box...:_thinking.:_confused

I highlighted the definitions to make it easier for you to understand how I really feel about your dumb imaginary ash...:laughing:

QUOTE "I've wasted enough time in this thread as it is."UNQUOTE

yeh, I'd say you've actually OVER wasted your time, but all is NOT for naught...WE all enjoyed the display...:yesgray:

Of whatever that was...:_confused

Seriously Trek, I think you've embarrassed yourself enough already...just let it go...

STEP THA EFF OFF..:slap:

Could we all agree to post nothing more in reply, other than ... :yesgray:

I think it would be a fun social experiment to see what type of spin, blather, & pontification could be conjured... in reply to a sphere...with a face that smiles...and agrees...:yesgray:

:yesgray:

...And...:dance:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scott Larson

...And...:dance:

---

Post "whatever" to each other...just nothing more than :yesgray: ...If tha birthday boy replies...:smilewink

As an aside, I wonder why his legions of like minded followers haven't started a Happy B-Day thread for him yet...seems odd..:_thinking..:_confused

D'ya suppose they might have been imaginary?...like the person we "think" we're replying to?

I dunno, there's somethin' just not right here...like someone has been fibb'n or somethin'...Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...:_thinking

Oh well, I'm sure he has a wordy & spinny type explaination ...:yesgray:

^^^^^ ROTFLMAO!!!! The amount of REAL "laughing out loud" I just did was phenomenal. Maybe I'm just EXTRA goofy tonight....but I thought that post right there was funny as sh*t.

:yesgray:

I would add :yesgray: but I'm not really here...

:noy:
Dont tell me what to do!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ldub

Could we all agree to post nothing more in reply, other than ... :yesgray:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingV77

:noy:
Dont tell me what to do!

---

Oh absolutely...wouldn't think of it...:smilewink

Phrasing it as a question makes it a request, not an order...:yesgray:

Ok you got me on that one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ldub

Could we all agree to post nothing more in reply, other than ... :yesgray:

---

:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VXR

:confused:

---

:yesgray:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VXR

:confused:

---

:yesgray:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

The answers to the questions you keep repeating are still there, you just don't like them because they've resulted in this thread illustrating that it's actually you who has the various "deficiencies" you've just described.

---

UMMM, nope.

I wouldn't have kept the discussion going if I didn't think that you might provide some valuable information.

There is the one question that you continue to dance around rather than answer because you know that it completely undermines the position you've taken. That question is: how does venting to the atmosphere differ from venting to the combustion chamber in regard to oil consumption? I can guarantee that you can search this thread top to bottom and back again & not be able to find your response to that question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Y33TREKker

Tom proved HIMSELF wrong a few times towards the beginning...and even admitted to it after his error was pointed out by SOMEONE OTHER THAN ME. But did he stop there with me? Hardly. Because here we are with him STILL trying to push a bad position,

---

Actually only once ... & doesn't the fact that I can admit my errors when proven wrong indicate that it is you rather than me that is keeping this cess pool of a discussion in motion?

I have to hand it to you. I've never met anyone like you before who is so prolific at consuming facts and spewing defication.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tom4bren

I have to hand it to you. I've never met anyone like you before who is so prolific at consuming facts and spewing defication.

---

:yesgray:

LOL....good'n

Running a bottle of SeaFoam in the crank case now & I'll change the oil tomorrow. We'll see if that helps in decreasing oil consumption. It's been a few tanks of gas since I've had to add any oil but prior to that it was up-n-down in a very mysterious manner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tom4bren

...prior to that it was up-n-down in a very mysterious manner.

---

Sounds like a girl I once knew. :bgwo:

Wow.

I ran a can of SeaFoam in the crank for a week & then changed the oil last weekend. It consumed a quart of oil this week.:freek: That was less than 500 miles.