Successor of the VX?

[thebear54]

OOPS...YUP YUP! "FREEDOM Transmission" .......SNICKER
John

[Jolly Roger VX'er]

OOPS...YUP YUP! "FREEDOM Transmission" .......SNICKER
John

I suppose I should list these in the F.S. Forum....but I have (1) WWII French Combat Rifle that is in near perfect condition in that it's only been dropped once.....

Also have a military surplus French Tank that needs work on the trannie as it only operates in reverse....

(1) copy of "French Foreign Legion" magazine featuring the highly coveted article on: "10 ways to display the white Flag with Pride while Looking Good"

.......and now back to our regularly scheduled program........

[Heraclid]

I beleive the Isuzu Odyssey was first the first kid on the block and then along came the Honda version about two years later. So it's only logical to assume that Isuzu built the Honda Mini-van.

Actually, Honda was first to sell the minivan, and Honda did build it. Honda Odysseys were new for 1995, and the Isuzu version (Oasis) followed suit in 1996. Both were sold through 1998, and in those years the Odyssey and Oasis were clones. That changed in 1999 when Honda substantially redesigned the Odyssey for that year. In 1999, Isuzu continued to sell the previous version under the name Oasis, but after 1999 the Oasis was dropped, while the redesigned Odyssey continued on to the present.

Basically Honda rushed a minivan to market and subsequently agreed to allow Isuzu to sell it too. Having bought some more time, Honda then built another one and dropped the previous one, forcing Isuzu to drop it as well because Honda was their supplier. Isuzu never had any interest in building its own minivan and never has produced one of its own.

Consumer Guide backs this up, saying the following:

"Basically a clone of the Honda Odyssey, which went on sale in the U.S. in 1995, the Oasis was built in Japan by Honda."

The article is here...
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/u...ex.cfm/id/2269


Now we could assume that Consumer Guide was in error and could theorize that since Honda needed to get in the minivan business fast, it would make sense to commission Isuzu to get it to market faster if Isuzu was already set up to do it. This would mean Honda borrowed an existing Isuzu platform. However, that means that Consumer Guide would have to be in error not once, but twice, because another article of theirs says this:

"Honda became the last major automaker to issue a minivan, adding the Accord-based Odyssey after the 1995 model year began."

Here's the link to it...
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/u...ex.cfm/id/2174

So what we have here is this - in this case, the Honda-Isuzu roles that produced the Honda Passport & Acura SLX were reversed. Isuzu slapped their badges on a Honda car-based minivan for a few years and sold it as an Isuzu.


So, Subaru and Saab are both bringing out a real SUV--so my next statement should not be a surprise. GM owns shares in Subaru and owns Saab!

Yeah, GM owns something like 20% of Subaru, but there's an interesting twist. Apparently they are adopting a more hands-off approach, allowing Saab to bring its SUV to market on a new Subaru SUV platform, rather than the existing GM platform the Trailblazer and so many others share. The article I read definitely implied that the Subaru B9 and Saab 9-6X share a platform that was not developed by GM.

What surprises me is the striking resemblance the Subaru B9 (now renamed the B9 Tribeca, not B9X) concept art has with the Nissan Murano. And the new name for it (borrowed from the area of New York City of the same name) conjures up something trendy and sophisticated, not rugged.