BTW, your response back on 1/25/14 (11:15am) in post #244 is incorrect and has flawed logic.
That's one way to look at it, and convenient for you I might add, as I never excluded, dismissed, omitted or otherwise failed to acknowledge any "group". In fact, I was quite specific to say there was an almost infinite number of "groups", which, by definition would mean your "random collection of members that DO happen to share your opinion" is included.
Just remember, you said that TREK, I didn't. (Not the first time some of you here have tried to put words in my mouth though.)
Interesting that that's where YOU went with that. You believing it doesn't make it a reality.
Is it simply and conveniently that you don't understand, what I said?
It could be viewed that you're simply trying to cloud the issue.
It would be entirely understandable why YOU wouldn't understand my post.
I don't want to, once again, simply and conveniently, be blamed for YOU not understanding my post.
You SERIOUSLY still don't understand? From you I usually expect nothing more though.
I hope you don't think I'm just trying to save face here or grabbing at straws or conveniently changing the question.
Once again, I could explain what I've said since you're proving yourself unable to follow along...
I can explain that to you, but I can't understand it for you too.
I sure hope, once again, I'm not simply (and conveniently) directing this to the wrong person.
You are a real piece of work TREK IMHO.....Your self-aggrandizing rants and writings, delusions of grandeaur, and paranoid musings, are IMHO simply... sad....that's all....sad.
.