scared meself!!!

[Y33TREKker]

Dude, you're either grasping at straws or you really don't understand the mechanics behind the PCV. AFAIK there isn't a positive pressure coming from the combusion chamber input where the PCV attaches so the breather will have the same effect as the crossover tube with or without the catch can. That said, I haven't measured it ... & I've proven myself to be fallible so please feel free to enlighten us less informed as to your logic.

The mechanics of a PCV system is not even what we're talking about now though Tom. What we WERE talking about is you trying to suggest that adding a vent filter to your oil cap is the exact same as the crossover tube idea you started this thread about.

Maybe you're just trying to save face now, but continuing to try to make what I've been saying appear illogical by grasping at your own straws to change the subject isn't the way to do it.

[tom4bren]

... adding a vent filter to your oil cap is the exact same as the crossover tube idea you started this thread about.

Please 'splain to me how it's not.

[Y33TREKker]

Please 'splain to me how it's not.

I already have...MULTIPLE times.

[tom4bren]

Sorry ... but nope. You said that it's not the same but didn't 'splain how the end effect would be any different.

[Y33TREKker]

Sorry ... but nope. You said that it's not the same but didn't 'splain how the end effect would be any different.

You just keep telling yourself you're right about that Tom...that's obviously what you do best.

[tom4bren]

You just keep telling yourself you're right about that Tom...that's obviously what you do best.

WTF???

Why so SNARKY?

I was honestly asking your opinion as to why you feel the current solution yields different results than my original 'proposed' approach.

If you'd rather just pick at the scab from earlier discussions though, I'll let it go.

[Ldub]

WTF???

Why so SNARKY?

I was honestly asking your opinion as to why you feel the current solution yields different results than my original 'proposed' approach.

If you'd rather just pick at the scab from earlier discussions though, I'll let it go.

Sooooooooo....it hasn't become abundantly clear to you?

It's everyone else....most definitely NOT tha chi-pom.

SHEESH...try N keep up, will ya?...

BTW, what'd ya use for baffling in your can?

[Y33TREKker]

WTF???

Why so SNARKY?

I was honestly asking your opinion as to why you feel the current solution yields different results than my original 'proposed' approach.

If you'd rather just pick at the scab from earlier discussions though, I'll let it go.

Snarky?

That's a convenient way for you to try to portray my answer Tom, especially when what you're asking me now has ONCE AGAIN been changed from what you were asking before.

When you conveniently change your questions like that, OF COURSE the previous answer isn't going to apply to the current question, but resorting to such things to try to direct attention away from your own confusion only makes you appear to be the person picking at scabs from earlier discussions.

Once again though, your original "proposed" approach didn't include the vent-to-atmosphere-filter being used in your current solution...so it simply isn't the same setup you keep telling yourself it is...