285/60/18 has been fit many times on our OEM rims because of the taller sidewall. As cobrajet pointed out, when you reduce that aspect ratio, the fact that a 285 is too wide for our rims becomes more apparent. I wouldnt put a 285 on with anything less than a 60 sidewall. It will deform the tire and reduce its handling characteristics.
Daly, i don't think you said before what your intentions were for the new tires. Is there a particular look you are going for, or a performance/handing characteristic you are looking for?
For a "beefy" look a 285/60/18 looks fantastic and requires very little modification to the cladding
For a more aggressive look but less extreme, a 265/60/18 gives a wider stance and taller profile but with no need for modification to the cladding
if you are going for gas mileage, a skinny tire is better but i wouldnt go any skinnier than the factory 245/60/18
if you are going for performance/handling a 255/55/18 or 255/60/18 would give you a wider tire without introducing a ton of weight or sidewall flex.
keep in mind these general rules....
wide tires give good traction in dry and very deep mud/snow (when you cant reach solid surface underneath) Wide tires also reduce gas mileage and add weight
skinny tires improve gas mileage but decrease dry traction. They also resist hydroplaning better. For mud and snow skinny tires push through and get to the road for better traction.
taller sidewalls protect your rim better and make the vehicle look more aggressive
shorter sidewalls help improve handling and allow you to "feel the road" (and bumps) more
tire sizing 101:
245/60/18
245 = tire width in mm
60 = aspect ratio (ie 60% of width) per sidewall.
18 = rim diameter in inches
so 245 x 0.60 = 147mm sidewall (5.79 inches)
5.79" + 18" + 5.79" = 29.58" overall diameter







Reply With Quote
