HB Scott Larson

[Y33TREKker]

It seems none of you who have once again felt the need to voice your two cents are considering that Scott's been trying to place the entire blame on me for how the other thread went south because of HIS initial comment. It's already been well illustrated in the past on this site how some of the vxinfo clique operates, and this thread has been yet another example. And anyone with an objective eye KNOWS that's not a biased statement, which is why it wasn't necessary for me to respond to each of your individual comments.

Scott could have confined his comments (both the direct ones and the off-handed/veiled ones) to PM's only too, but he didn't, so he brought this on himself...regardless of what thread I respond in. What's the matter, has Scott been cwying that his birfday thwead got all icky? And still talking about settling his difference with fighting? And here I was thinking that our elders were supposed to set GOOD examples.

It's no wonder the world remains in such a perpetual mess...when older generations double down on their own mistakes, want to shut others up who point out those mistakes with violence, and since actions speak louder than words, clearly illustrate that they're obviously incapable of just letting things go REGARDLESS of saying that they are.

Once, again, sad indeed.

So for all of you who have responded in kind, save your future birthday wishes. I'm sure they'd be as empty of real meaning as your comments in this thread have been anyway. As some of you are obviously yet to realize about me since it hasn't been explained to you, I'd rather people hate me for who I am than have them like me for who I'm not.

[Ldub]

I'd rather people hate me for who I am than have them like me for who I'm not.

At least THAT seems to be work'n out well for ya...

[Ldub]

It seems none of you who have once again felt the need to voice your two cents are considering that Scott's been trying to place the entire blame on me for how the other thread went south because of HIS initial comment. It's already been well illustrated in the past on this site how some of the vxinfo clique operates, and this thread has been yet another example.

It's no wonder the world remains in such a perpetual mess...when older generations double down on their own mistakes, want to shut others up who point out those mistakes with violence, and since actions speak louder than words, clearly illustrate that they're obviously incapable of just letting things go REGARDLESS of saying that they are.

Glad that you've FINALLY come to the conclusion that it's ALWAYS everyone else, & NEVER anything to do with you...

That makes total sense...

[Y33TREKker]

Glad that you've FINALLY come to the conclusion that it's ALWAYS everyone else, & NEVER anything to do with you...

That makes total sense...

Only to you apparently, since I CLEARLY stated that I was referring only to "those who have once again felt the need to voice their two cents" in this thread and the other one. I never said "everyone". And besides, you've obviously forgotten that not everyone always agree with your comments here regarding our differences. Maybe someday you'll finally come to the conclusion that just because YOU say something on this website, it doesn't automatically mean it's an accurate reflection of reality.

Your comments in this thread have been especially hypocritical since you've once again had no problem going along with the idea that I'm the person here who has trouble letting things go, and yet it was you specifically who dragged the subject of site donation back into the picture. Convenient.

[Ldub]

Only to you apparently, since I CLEARLY stated that I was referring only to "those who have once again felt the need to voice their two cents" in this thread and the other one. I never said "everyone". And besides, you've obviously forgotten that not everyone always agree with your comments here regarding our differences. Maybe someday you'll finally come to the conclusion that just because YOU say something on this website, it doesn't automatically mean it's an accurate reflection of reality.

Your comments in this thread have been especially hypocritical since you've once again had no problem going along with the idea that I'm the person here who has trouble letting things go, and yet it was you specifically who dragged the subject of site donation back into the picture. Convenient.

Squirm & spin, squirm & spin...

Same skite, different day...

Get a clue, buy a vowel, get some help...whatever...

Do whatever it takes to make reality comfortable for ya...

I especially liked this passage...

yet it was you specifically who dragged the subject of site donation back into the picture. Convenient.

Well DUH...

And every single offer to donate hard earned money, even in a down economy, to support VXinfo, & lessen/rid the site of your whiny diatribes...

Was in earnest...

Stay tuned for another version of "squirm & spin" in...

3-2-1...

As stated before, it's all about the last word for the trek...and quite frankly, I can't think of anything else that need be said.(unless ya wanna go for name calling & stuff...)

The last word belongs to you...

[Y33TREKker]

...The last word belongs to you...

If only that were actually ever the case.

Apparently though, the irony still hasn't sunk in that it was YOU who apparently needed the last word by bringing up the subject of site donation again when the issue between Scott and I had NOTHING to do with that.

The fact that it still remains a mystery to you why I regularly suggest that explaining things to you makes no difference remains a mystery.

[Ldub]

The fact that it still remains a mystery to you why I regularly suggest that explaining things to you makes no difference remains a mystery.

So....using the scientific method of extrapolation, I can surmise that being a ----- causes redundancy?...

[Y33TREKker]

So....using the scientific method of extrapolation, I can surmise that being a ----- causes redundancy?...

You see, you didn't understand that one either. Must everything be explained to you?

[VXR]

it's all about the last word for the trek

Rlly???

Srsly???

Who is it that always has to have the last word?

What I don't understand is how some of you have said in the past that you bought your VX to be unique owners among a sea of cookie-cutter vehicle owners, yet when you get here you try to quash uniqueness out of various VX owners by actively trying to silence differing opinions among VX owners.

Very well said.

[VXR]

And why grown men feel the need to congratulate each other with happy birthday threads over and over and over again on a car forum is beyond me

[tom4bren]

And why grown men feel the need to congratulate each other with happy birthday threads over and over and over again on a car forum is beyond me

How dare you!!! I may grow old, but I'll never grow up ... that's why I have a VX.

As far as the happy birthday wishes on a car forum: maybe it's my narcissistic nature, but I like being singled out for special attention ... regardless of the 'forum' ... that's why I have a VX.

So for the next 38 seconds, I get the last word: Happy friggin Birthday Scott.

[RickOKC]

And why grown men feel the need to congratulate each other with happy birthday threads over and over and over again on a car forum is beyond me

I must admit, that really is a very interesting observation.

Why should a group of people waste their time honoring a silly, congenial tradition that is universally celebrated amongst civilized western society when they could be using that time to troll a forum like a rabid cockroach?

[RickOKC]

It seems none of you who have once again felt the need to voice your two cents are considering that Scott's been trying to place the entire blame on me for how the other thread went south because of HIS initial comment. It's already been well illustrated in the past on this site how some of the vxinfo clique operates, and this thread has been yet another example. And anyone with an objective eye KNOWS that's not a biased statement, which is why it wasn't necessary for me to respond to each of your individual comments.

Scott could have confined his comments (both the direct ones and the off-handed/veiled ones) to PM's only too, but he didn't, so he brought this on himself...regardless of what thread I respond in. What's the matter, has Scott been cwying that his birfday thwead got all icky? And still talking about settling his difference with fighting? And here I was thinking that our elders were supposed to set GOOD examples.

It's no wonder the world remains in such a perpetual mess...when older generations double down on their own mistakes, want to shut others up who point out those mistakes with violence, and since actions speak louder than words, clearly illustrate that they're obviously incapable of just letting things go REGARDLESS of saying that they are.

Once, again, sad indeed.

So for all of you who have responded in kind, save your future birthday wishes. I'm sure they'd be as empty of real meaning as your comments in this thread have been anyway. As some of you are obviously yet to realize about me since it hasn't been explained to you, I'd rather people hate me for who I am than have them like me for who I'm not.

Yeah, let's start with Scott's initial comment. He messed up. He made a wrong assumption and has since admitted his error. Why are you STILL dredging that up after his admission of error?

What the crap do you want?

And, frankly, SHOVE your repeated whining about "cliques." I watched your little "Bestie", your 2nd-tier, "me-too" crony who typically comes to your rescue - the Chester to your Butch - chase another member around the site FOR OVER A YEAR trying to provoke an argument and yet YOU -- SAID -- NOTHING. You are accusing people of being hypocrites? Apparently your limited understanding of that word only applies when Earth isn't revolving around you.

But, kudos to you - I was surprised that you admitted you were so pleased with getting the negative attention you crave. Rarely does a troll admit their primary goal is provoking others into giving them attention. And, btw, it's not hate - it's pity.


$150

[Ldub]

$150

So...whaddya say'n here bud...

I gots my Jedi mojo back?...

[Y33TREKker]

Yeah, let's start with Scott's initial comment. He messed up. He made a wrong assumption and has since admitted his error. Why are you STILL dredging that up after his admission of error?

Maybe because he's still saying stuff like this?

Name calling? How about sniveling? Whining? Self absorbed? Obstinate? Impossible? Self-righteous? Obnoxious? Obtuse? Indignant? Unapologetic? Annoying!!!!?

Sorry Dub, I just couldn't hold back any longer! At least I deleted the appropriate expletives...

Back to you Trekk, insert final word HERE________

What the crap do you want?

And, frankly, SHOVE your repeated whining about "cliques." I watched your little "Bestie", your 2nd-tier, "me-too" crony who typically comes to your rescue - the Chester to your Butch - chase another member around the site FOR OVER A YEAR trying to provoke an argument and yet YOU -- SAID -- NOTHING. You are accusing people of being hypocrites? Apparently your limited understanding of that word only applies when Earth isn't revolving around you.

So you're equating a GROUP of people chasing certain others around to ONE person voicing similar opinions as mine? If I haven't said a word in those instances, it's because I'm aware that some people here are perfectly capable of defending themselves against hostile crowds ON THEIR OWN as opposed to others who only seem comfortable making their comments when they have the safety of numbers on their side. I'll leave it to you to decide which group your actions place you in.

But, kudos to you - I was surprised that you admitted you were so pleased with getting the negative attention you crave. Rarely does a troll admit their primary goal is provoking others into giving them attention. And, btw, it's not hate - it's pity.

$150

You didn't understand what I meant, because if you honestly think I LIKE these types of discussions, you're obviously simply another person here who doesn't know me as well as they think they do. You don't seem to have a problem with other people here defending what they feel are false assumptions against THEM, so why do you have such a problem when it's coming from me?