Not sure about that...I can turn sharper than any of the Jeeps in my club.
That's why I was trying to keep my references general and not specific. Of course there are exceptions. Both are good systems and have their places, but from what I've heard, your typical yoke joint found in a steering axle is built beefier, can take more abuse, and therefore can turn more with less breakage overall vs. a typical CV setup designed primarily for onroad use.

J/K, I would be curious to see the new IFS kit pitted against a similar set up solid axle.
I did get to open the kit up in the 12 hours I was home before hitting the road again. VERY beefy. More to follow in separate thread.
That's what I want to see too. But I'd also like to see them both installed with locking differentials to boot. If we're going to see some true results, I think that should be a requirement. IFS is very capable in it's own right and the articulation kit makes it even better. I really do believe that IFS is probably the correct choice for the vast majority of people out there. A solid axle isn't a magic ticket to absolute offroad superiority and people who view things that way are just asking to be proven wrong. Solid axle, like anything else, has it's place in rigs where overall durability and ease of trail maintenance are paramount. Like Billy said there are exceptions to any rule. There are people running Baja with solid axles and people running rocks with IFS and both doing very well. It all boils down to preference and what pros and cons you're willing to live with. I'm going solid axle because I got tired of worrying about tearing boots and wanted a system that would be worry free from a breakage standpoint. There are also a lot more gearing options available to most solid axles and you don't have to feel like you're wheeling on borrowed time if you install a locker in one.