Man vs Wild

[VX KAT]

I love both shows, but, yes they definitely are different. Also with Survivorman doing 7 days, and Bear Grylls only doing 3, I think that's some of the difference IMHO. I find both share such cool info and such gorgeous scenery that I can look beyond the "reality TV" aspect of it.

[VXR]

I prefer Survivorman . A lot more realistic. And he films it himself and has no help.

X2

[JHarris1385]

I love it. I dont care about the film crew and so forth. What he does is uses only when or if needed so for the sake of tv its fine that it is there. Considering the amount of time he is out in the 'wild' it just makes sense. His knowledge and ability to eat almost anything to survive shows his dedication.

This show mixed with the move Into The Wild - really makes me want to take a long camping trip on foot with minimal tools. A friend of mine hiked his way from souther AZ to the Grand Canyon on a three month excursion last summer with only $100 on him as an emergency.

[Knivx]

I like survivorman better. When i first saw man vs wild i didn't like it for the fact he had the crew and all and was a little more daring with stuff he did for being in a survival situation. (Why would i risk hurting myself doing that? kinda stuff) But the more i watch it the more i like it.

[tomdietrying]

I'm a big fan of both. They both provide entertainment vaule in different ways.
Peace.
Tom