Hmmm, looks like very fishy evidence to me. The two(2) pictures were taken only three(3) minutes apart (in the wee hours of the morning, too) and shows the obstructing placcard in different positions. The 12:19 picture has the placcard cock-eyed crooked, while the 12:22 picture has it re-positioned in a more level and straighter depiction.
If I was the Judge, I'd be asking why were the pictures taken in the wee hours of the morning??? To hide from possible witnesses??? Why is the obstructing placcard in a different position when the snapshots were taken only three(3) minutes apart??? Was it because the first initial picture didn't cover all of the STOP letters, and was re-positioned for the second picture??? If the placcard is "dusted for fingerprints", would we find a positive I.D. match to someone here in this courtroom (perhaps the accused defendant)??? If so; then can we add the additional charges of "Obstruction of Justice with intent to defraud a law enforcement investigation", and of course "Pergury"??? Afterwhich, I would have just one last question: Would the Defendant please rise???
You don't have to be stupid, but it helps.
