about the Pats and they could not even beat the Jets? Review the games The Pack (who I would be rooting for if Jets or the Pats or Indy had won) had a tough time against a mediocre Bear team. The Steelers wrapped up the favored Jets by half time. And if you think the Steelers did not change to a prevent at HALF TIME and let the Jets get small gains to run off the clock may I suggest switching to following bowling as it moves at a slower pace with less rules so easier to understand and follow. You may notice the Steelers stopped blitzing so often and were playing a lot further off the receivers in the 2nd half just to keep te Jets from having a big play.
"Take it up with my butt, cuz he's the only one that gives a crap"
Carter Pewterschmidt
read and try to understand THIS![]()
Yes a blogger on yahoo who writes sports picked 2-3 events that went against the Seahawks focuses strictly on what was less than 2 minutes of a one hour game and tried to prove his bias in doing so. Now read this http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/11242265/ from a real sports reporter from NBC sports and try to keep an open mind
Interesting article:
Super Bowl XL seems to get worse each day that passes as fans get a chance to replay the game in their minds or by watching the tape of the game. This issue is not going away any time soon and I think the NFL has a big problem on its handsIt is clear to me that a few controversial calls could have changed the outcome of the game and that should concern every NFL fanThe Seahawks had six more first downs (20-14) and more total yards (396 to 339) than the Steelers did. Seattle even won the time of possession battle by controlling the clock for more than 33 minutes. They also had one less turnoverAll true statements now imagine those three specific plays are nullified by bad calls and pit losesThe Steelers ended up winning the game because of three specific plays![]()