Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Jurrassic Park?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Since
    Apr 2007
    Location
    2001, Proton #1238
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanked: 0
    That would have been a cool VX moment.

    Cars designed by spreadsheets make sense. Cars designed by engineers make history.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    SOLD!
    Posts
    7,257
    Thanked: 2
    Quote Originally Posted by kodiak View Post
    That would have been a cool VX moment.
    For sure. It would have made the movie that much better. VXes just look soooo cool on the silver screen.

    Bart

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Apr 2007
    Location
    2001, Proton #1238
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanked: 0
    That was back when CG was cool, now it’s just a lazy way to save money.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    SOLD!
    Posts
    7,257
    Thanked: 2
    Quote Originally Posted by kodiak View Post
    That was back when CG was cool, now it’s just a lazy way to save money.
    Yeah, CG should be used only when conventional effects absolutely cannot accomplish the same thing. Take the movie Species for instance, or Alien 3. Both of those films would have been sooooo much better had they stayed away from CG as much as possible. IMO, CG has got to be TOP NOTCH (as in LOTR or Transformers) to be successful. Otherwise, its just crap.

    Bart

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Apr 2007
    Location
    2001, Proton #1238
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanked: 0
    I now that CG was really going down hill when a first saw to movie The Mummy Returns. Up to that point most of the CG out there was fairly decent, there where some bad apples but not many. Then this peace of crap came out and you could tell the CG was all about saving money. It was a taste of things to come.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    SOLD!
    Posts
    7,257
    Thanked: 2
    Quote Originally Posted by kodiak View Post
    I now that CG was really going down hill when a first saw to movie The Mummy Returns. Up to that point most of the CG out there was fairly decent, there where some bad apples but not many. Then this peace of crap came out and you could tell the CG was all about saving money. It was a taste of things to come.
    Yeah, I never watched any of the Mummy movies. I am not a fan of Brendan Fraiser or the films. For me, it was Alien 3 and Species. Both of those movies use such god awful digital effects, that it really made me hate CG. It wasn't until I saw The Matrix that I started thinking differently. And then with LOTR, I realized that when done right, CG works and looks awesome. Gollum looked fantastic. Its funny though, watch The Matrix today and the effects look a little dated.

    Bart

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Apr 2007
    Location
    2001, Proton #1238
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanked: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by nfpgasmask View Post
    Yeah, I never watched any of the Mummy movies. I am not a fan of Brendan Fraiser or the films. For me, it was Alien 3 and Species. Both of those movies use such god awful digital effects, that it really made me hate CG. It wasn't until I saw The Matrix that I started thinking differently. And then with LOTR, I realized that when done right, CG works and looks awesome. Gollum looked fantastic. Its funny though, watch The Matrix today and the effects look a little dated.

    Bart
    They used CG in LOTR?:homer: That’s the trick, if you notice there using CG then they’re doing it wrong.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    May 2003
    Location
    2000, white, IronMan, SUPERCHARGED, 0069
    Posts
    1,220
    Thanked: 0

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by nfpgasmask View Post
    Yeah, CG should be used only when conventional effects absolutely cannot accomplish the same thing. Take the movie Species for instance, or Alien 3. Both of those films would have been sooooo much better had they stayed away from CG as much as possible. IMO, CG has got to be TOP NOTCH (as in LOTR or Transformers) to be successful. Otherwise, its just crap.

    Bart

    AMEN, I've been preach'in this for along time. Just look at all the crapola playing on Sci-Fi Channel.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]"If its fast and reliable, its not cheap;
    if its fast and cheap, its not reliable;
    if its cheap and reliable, its not fast."


    If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jun 2007
    Location
    1999 Ironman, 2001 Proton Yellow
    Posts
    189
    Thanked: 0
    Yeah..the Sci-Fi channel movies are so poor. The clips they show you to advertise the movie and tempt you into watching are really great looking.... but then again they are split second shots. Once the movie comes on you have to change channels within 15 minutes..or take a nap!

Similar Threads

  1. To park or Not to Park -- or Sell
    By KeithVXlvr in forum VX Talk...
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06/19/2009, 01:39 PM
  2. HELP! My VX wont come out of park.
    By smorris65 in forum VX Talk...
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04/11/2007, 03:28 PM
  3. Stuck in park! Help
    By Dirty Dave in forum VX Troubleshooting...
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03/08/2005, 05:32 PM
  4. Roll while in park
    By VR4-Quest in forum VX Troubleshooting...
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02/26/2005, 01:55 AM
  5. Shifting Out of Park
    By shoota77 in forum VX Talk...
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10/13/2004, 10:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
$lv_vb_eventforums_eventdetails