MPG or Not MPG

[circmand]

I know noone here is impressed with the MPG of the VX and for good reason. However, the best time to think about this is before you buy. I think the best you can do is maybe a few miles more per gallon without a major change such as a Diesel swap like is being attempted on another string here. However, if you end up paying $5000 for even double mpg or sell you VX for a more efficient vehicle and end up getting new car payments are you ahead. Even if you double your MPG to 30 from a consrvative 15 mpg what do you gain? For every 10000 miles you drive instead of paying $666 for gas you pay $333 (est $3 a gallon) That is a savings of $333. You do not break even until you have gone 150,000 miles. (Someone check my math) And this is best case scenarion like you have the $5000 sitting around or you get 0% financing for the payments. Even still you lose the interest you could earn off the money. This is a problem I have with enviros (noone here please dont yell at me) they say get rid of all current cars and replace them with Hybrids. Well what do you do with the current cars (toss them in the dump) and how do people afford the new cars that are $30000 a pop when they cant afford new cars now at $20000 a pop?

[tom4bren]

I didn't check your math but it seems ball park.

I agree with everything you said but wanted to actually take it one step further. The same arguements apply to repairs. Even if you're paying $100/month in repairs, it's still less than a new car payment. Remember, buying a new car is NEVER an investment - you buy it because you WANT it. "Drive what you like. I like driving my VX".

[WormGod]

I know noone here is impressed with the MPG of the VX and for good reason....

I can raise my hand and claim to be one of the ones who says, that quote above is very true for me. That whole "Hybrid/Prius" theory of savings was actually worked up in many editorials and they claimed it did take anywhere between 120k - 150k miles, plus with the added cost of upkeep and maintaining to break even and start seeing savings. I dont know, and I really cant really care. The fact is, those cars are still not affordable enough for me to care, let alone ugly as all hell. I still think we are in the "efficient" infancy for vehicles. The fine line of looks, performance, and fuel consumption still seem pretty hard to get into one package, for a decent price at least.

[circmand]

I do have to admit I while purchasing a retirement investment the other day (lottery Tickets) There was a girl in a little Suzuki who actually purchased $3 of gas. I know it did not fill her tank up but the fact that $3 was going to get her by for awhile made me envious. The car was new but had no style and I could have put it in the back of my VX

[Y33TREKker]

I actually think enviros have both their hearts and minds in the right places, it's just that some of their more hard-core (smug) members make the whole lot seem a bit tedious at times. Had to get that South Park reference in. Wouldn't it best be to keep in mind that overall, it's the planet that's being saved in the process, and not just a few hundred dollars a year? After all, what good will all that money saved do a person if there's no place left to spend it worth living in?

We shouldn't lose sight of the forest for all the trees...especially while we still have some.

Maybe instead of dumping trillions into the worldwide fight for oil, our government could instead redirect some of that $$$, and subsidize the manufacturing of a nationwide fleet of hybrids so there could be one in the garage of every US citizen. Wouldn't that start to have an effect on both ends even in the short term? Lessened need for foreign oil would mean a lessened need for foreign military presence.

As far as my VX mileage goes. I just don't drive it as much as my other vehicle that gets better mileage, and am currently at about 26k on the odo.

[circmand]

Y33 that is a bit of over simplification. The trillions being dumped are an investment and that money is paid back when the oil is sold. It has actually allowed most of South America to raise the standard of living for their people. I do not see how the world would be better if we all got hybrids right now went trillions in debt and had to use millions of acres of land to dump our current vehicles with the lead and other toxic metals in them. You mention you have several vehicles. Whether one is the greenest vehicle available owning more than one vehicle uses up resources and causes polution in its manufacture even if it is not being driven. Maybe we should let the government decide what cars we should build and who gets to drive what vehicle. Single guys would get a smart car and remain single as no woman would date them. The worst solution is to let government make decisions they screw everything up and costs would go through the roof. Do you want the same government that screwed up with Katrina deciding what cars we should have. I know Enviros are good hearted but their heads are not. They simply refuse to look at the facts and simply out scream anyone trying to discus the situation logically. The last thing I am worried about is the trees. I saw a documentary on the other night and scientists have discovered how to make more. Apparently you put this little thing in the ground called a seed water it throw some dog poop on it and in a few months it is a small tree. Later it grows even bigger and there is no way to tell it is not a real tree. (sorry I watch SP too) To protest cutting down a renwable and clean resource make housing unavailable or to expensive for the poor and requires man made materials too be produced that can cause pollution. I do not wantto see that planet paved over but the enviros need to stop protesting and start producing real world solutions.

[Y33TREKker]

Y33 that is a bit of over simplification. The trillions being dumped are an investment and that money is paid back when the oil is sold.

But that's what I'm saying. If the need for the oil decreased, the need for that type of investment would also decrease, freeing up that $$$ for other things. While there would be an additional expenditure up front, the ROI would be a lot more than just $$$ as it is now.

I think that everyone tries to make the solution too complicated. If we always let ourselves get mired in the details of what might happen, hardly anything would ever get done, which seems to be the way things are going at the moment.

And noone said anything about pushing all current non-green vehicles into a landfill. Subsidizing hybrids would just be a way to make them more affordable so that more people could own them, causing the by-product of being able to drive them, even if it was only every other day for those of us who like to have a second, cool-factor vehicle in the garage too (like say a VX) because of it's uniqueness.

Those trillions may be considered an investment by some, but it could be debated whether that is an investment in the future.

[circmand]

the need for that type of investment would also decrease, freeing up that $$$ for other things. While there would be an additional expenditure up front, the ROI would be a lot more than just $$$ as it is now.

Okay I will give you credit you have thought it through further than most. However, if we do not spend what we currently spend we bring up less oil. Less oil translates into less money brought in do less to sell. If we do not bring in that money where do we get the money to invest in the stuff you want us to invest in. Frankly government needs to be less intrusive and regulatory. If they hadn't stepped in earlier and decided the gasoline internal combustion engine was the way to go we might have had other companies investing in alternative systems all along and already have the problem solved. So who is to say another government program will not cause even worse problems. And this is not a what if, we already see the problems from corn based ethanol is doing to food prices. Also a fact the batteries the hybrids run on are only good for a few years and then they get thrown out. What do we do then.

you also say we cant let the what ifs interefere in trying to solve the problems okay but we need more than why not to pursue a given direction.

[IndianaVX]

i say drill in alaska, drop oil prices across the globe, let that money that is saved go into development of green autos that no one can afford. heck, hugo shavez is drilling awful close to our ocean border right now, and they are paying around .17 cents for a gallon of gas. if gas was even close to the 2.00 dollar mark, or less, think of what would happen with our economy with the extra money in consumers hands. maybe afford that newer car.
i have no problem with trying to be green to a point. but i do have a problem with legeslation saying that auto manufaturers HAVE to be producing cars with higher, and higher mpg. which translates to lighter, and weaker cars and little power. and then cramming them down our throats. and dont they also have gas (an oil product)involved with rolling the wheels down the road
also look at what the effect of the whole ethenol push is starting with the price of corn.
and if the government gave everyone a green transport, who really is going to pay for that car??? all of us, just to apease the few.
i keep the lights off when they need to be. ive got auto thermostats in my house. i mow after 6. i go in, not drive thru, fill up after sunset, and more. the truck i want to drive needs gas. i knew that.
im really not trying to start an argument, please. i just dont understand why the urgency. we are always going to need oil. lets drill our own, get prices down, and then work on the renewables. i dont believe much, if any of the global warming hoopla, when i was growing up, it was the comming ice age, and i was a scared kid thinking about how when i was 40, the world was going to be covered in ice..... well, im 42 now, 30 years later

david

(im a little out of practice of making post. please excuse my breaks in thought line.)