Hagerty Insurance Poll

[circmand]

Thought you might enjoy this. Hagerty Insurance did a poll asking what were the worst cars of all times. All are well known so no obscure ones are listed. Do you agree? Disagree? Any other nomnations?


1. AMC Pacer – The Pacer’s interesting styling prompted one respondent to wonder “I’d like to know what planet the designers were from.”
Yugo – Mechanical flaws and poor quality put the Yugo near the top. “My 2. Yugo improved my mechanic skills greatly,” said one respondent. “Somedays I miss that car, but then I remember the bad ride, poor brakes, no guts and bad interior.”
3. Ford Pinto – The majority of respondents cited a notorious design flaw that caused explosions in rear-end collisions. “Underpowered, cheap plastic, bodies prone to rust and, oh yeah, they blow up too,” said one.
4. Pontiac Aztek – The unique styling of the latest model on the list prompted its addition, according to most respondents. “There must have been a front-end design team and a rear-end design team. And the two teams never spoke to each other,” said one.
5. Chevrolet Vega – Poor design, construction and mechanical failure were the main reasons behind its inclusion. “There seemed to be a competition between the engineering and assembly teams as to who could be the bigger screw-up,” claimed one respondent.
6. AMC Gremlin – Commenting on its styling, one person called it “the most hideously ill-proportioned car of all time.”
7. Chevrolet Corvair – For most, it was mechanics rather than appearance at issue. “Reliability and safety mostly, as it wasn't that bad looking,” was the reasoning of one respondent.
8. AMC Matador – Design was the main reason behind the Matador’s inclusion. “Even as a kid in the '70s, I recall it being particularly offensive to the eye, from its bug-eye headlamps, through the overly thick landau roof, ending with a droopy decklid and taillamps that appear sourced from a boat trailer,” said one respondent.
9. Edsel – A notorious design and marketing failure, one respondent said the Edsel “equals the standard by which all other automotive brand failures have been judged (and ridiculed) for fifty years.”
10. Chevrolet Chevette – Mechanical unreliability was the reasoning of most who voted for the Chevette. “When the car went into any type of water puddle it would suck water into the engine. They fell apart after 40k miles,” said one.

[VehiGAZ]

I got that Hagerty e-mail today too!

My sister bought me a little book called Crap Cars a while back, and some of the ones from the Hagerty list were in that book too (it's basically the top 50 or top 100 all-time crappiest cars). There are lots of bad ones out there beyond Hagerty's top-10.

[nfpgasmask]

Well, I would agree on all fronts, but for some reason I think the Gremlin is kinda cool and unique looking....

Bart

[etlsport]

id mostly agree.. although i hate to admit.. everytime i see an aztek these days i think how much they remind me of VXs.. a couople times i looked at them and thought wow that paint would look good on a vx

[Ldub]

id mostly agree.. although i hate to admit.. everytime i see an aztek these days i think how much they remind me of VXs.. a couople times i looked at them and thought wow that paint would look good on a vx

Whatever you're smokin', I want some...asstek & VX look alike ? ...

On a more serious note, I think the Ford Granada should be on that list somewhere. First wife had one when we met...married her anyway.

She wasn't so bad, car was total POS.

[Mark B]

The list is BS.
I had a 1973 AMC Gremlin X. 304 V8. Lots of power. That car was fast.
I bought it for just under $ 3,000. I sold 15 years later and got I thing around $ 1,500. I also had other AMC car and they treated me good.
When you are in your teens, who cares what the car looks like, you just wanted any car. Not like the kids today that want a brand new $ 30,000 car with no concept about maintenance and insurace costs.
Besides, those cars in the 70's, were made to be serviced by yourself and not take them to the dealers to be ripped off.