Steelers 21
Seahawks 10
Printable View
read and try to understand THIS:yesb:
Yes a blogger on yahoo who writes sports picked 2-3 events that went against the Seahawks focuses strictly on what was less than 2 minutes of a one hour game and tried to prove his bias in doing so. Now read this http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/11242265/ from a real sports reporter from NBC sports and try to keep an open mind
Interesting article:
Quote:
Super Bowl XL seems to get worse each day that passes as fans get a chance to replay the game in their minds or by watching the tape of the game. This issue is not going away any time soon and I think the NFL has a big problem on its hands
Quote:
It is clear to me that a few controversial calls could have changed the outcome of the game and that should concern every NFL fan
Quote:
The Seahawks had six more first downs (20-14) and more total yards (396 to 339) than the Steelers did. Seattle even won the time of possession battle by controlling the clock for more than 33 minutes. They also had one less turnover
All true statements now imagine those three specific plays are nullified by bad calls and pit loses:yesb:Quote:
The Steelers ended up winning the game because of three specific plays
SB 48!!!
GO HAWKS!!!!
:LineWave:
Should be a GREAT game but I have to go with the Broncos
:_group2::_group2::_group2:
Go BRONCOS!!!!!
:dance:
IMHO... :cool:
BRONCOS WIN.. 21-17
jo
Go!!!
Hawks!!!!
So this Super Bowl - is it 10 pin bowling, or Lawn Bowls?????
PK
Wipeout!........at least some of the commercials have been funny....Dober-hua...:laugho::laugho:
Like I said...
...Broncos win 21 -17.
:_thinking
WTF!!!...was that!
And frankly.... The Ads SUCKED ..
but Bruno Mars was killer.
jo
Congrats to the Hawks...They certainly were the better team this time...