WikiLeaks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marlin

True, they do work for us, yet they make FAR more than their employers. Doesn't make sense if the employee makes more than the boss? Especially if the employee controls their own salary?

---

I'd reply, but I'm not sure how. Was that meant to be sarcastic, rhetorical, or simply an example of the over-esteem I mentioned which is sometimes mistakenly placed on those in positions of "power" or affluence?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Stephen Biko

Like "***-ange" when you clearly meant A.s.s-ange?



Like using the "treason" non-sequitor to paint the US as a victim of "***-ange?"



High irony from someone who bases his claims on the assumed support of people "here who have any legal background."

---

If you actually read the post I was saying people with legal background would support the legal description NOT NECESARILY MY VIEWPOINT. I assume that is why you did not do a quote where my post would be easily available for those reading your post? If you cant make your point dont make stuff up or take my statements out of context. That is the type of thing that used to work in the past. However people now see through it and is what exposed the global warming myths as lies meant to allow people like Al Gore to make millions of the hysteria.

You know one of the things I liked about this forum when I joined was the lack of political debates... seems like we're headed the other way lately though.

I think you guys need to trade in this: :badhorse:

for this: :_beer:

Retreating back to the main forum now before I get yelled at. :)

Mmmmmmmmmmmm..... Beer.

weres hot wasabi junkie when you need him...lol sorry I had to

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vt_maverick

You know one of the things I liked about this forum when I joined was the lack of political debates

---

:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by don moore

weres hot wasabi junkie when you need him

---

don't tell vt he may lose all hope:yesb:

:whiteflag: :flower:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vt_maverick

You know one of the things I liked about this forum when I joined was the lack of political debates... seems like we're headed the other way lately though.

I think you guys need to trade in this: :badhorse:

for this: :_beer:

Retreating back to the main forum now before I get yelled at. :)

---

BS, this thread is clearly labeled as a political thread. If you don't want to get involved or read about it, don't look at it. its not like this is buried in a thread about how to get a white L.V. shifter boot or how to fit a slushy machine in dashboard:bgwb:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by technocoy

Mmmmmmmmmmmm..... Beer.

---

I like Beer too

Here's a new twist for ya:

Who's to say that ANY of the documents on wikileak are genuine???

Wouldn't it be far cheaper for someone to create 40K+ pages of fraudulent documents than to collect the true classified ones?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tom4bren

Wouldn't it be far cheaper for someone to create 40K+ pages of fraudulent documents than to collect the true classified ones?

---

Not really. Generating that many different documents addressing that many different situations around the world and making sure they correlate with known facts in a believable fashion would be practically impossible.

True, but ...

With the available technology in the 1960's it would've been impossible to 'hype' the moon landing too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marlin

BS, this thread is clearly labeled as a political thread. If you don't want to get involved or read about it, don't look at it. its not like this is buried in a thread about how to get a white L.V. shifter boot or how to fit a slushy machine in dashboard:bgwb:

---

WikiLeaks
Started by crotchrocket
Chit-Chat ... Anything Non-VX Related

Clearly you see what you want to see. :) I'm just saying that I don't understand why a discussion about WikiLeaks has to devolve into liberal v. conservative name-calling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vt_maverick

I'm just saying that I don't understand why a discussion about WikiLeaks has to devolve into liberal v. conservative name-calling.

---

It hasn't. It's devolved into authoritarian vs libertarian name-calling.

why can't they leak something interesting.....like what does the government really know about UFO's and was the 1947 incident @ Roswell real or just a myth for the ages?


My viewpoint: Open-minded skeptic.