OUCH! :mad: If you ask me, R&T has their head up VW's arse, which is apparently dubbed "Concept A" ("A" for arse) because it LOOKS like arse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Road & Track
Printable View
OUCH! :mad: If you ask me, R&T has their head up VW's arse, which is apparently dubbed "Concept A" ("A" for arse) because it LOOKS like arse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Road & Track
Yeah, I'd agree with you on that one. They pretty much goo their pants every time VW does something new with the GTI.
http://www.caranddriver.com/assets/i...2006141117.jpg
Volkswagen Concept A
Other than the strange coupe roofline and suicide doors, the Concept A looks like Volkswagen's upcoming compact SUV, codenamed Marrakech.
BY RAY HUTTON
PHOTOGRAPHY BY MIKE VALENTE
March 2006
Slotted below the Touareg in the VW lineup � but named to keep it in the North African family � the Marrakech will be based on a Golf platform with raised ground clearance and four-wheel drive. The concept uses the VW 1.4-liter TSI engine that combines a supercharger and a turbocharger. In this project, the engine runs on natural gas. Thus fuelled, it produces 148 hp. The production car, expected as a 2008 model, will share the mechanical layout with the concept and could have its full-length folding fabric sunroof, but won't have the low coupe roof, the center-opening coach doors, or the twenty-inch wheels of Concept A.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....ticle_id=10713
--------------------------------------------------------------------
How is this like a Vehicross? It's super charged and turboed and it still gets only 148 horsepower? Natural gas must be really effecient! 148 HP with a 1.4L - comparing this to a Wankel Rotary NA Engine would be more acurate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 Isuzu VehiCross
1980 Mazda RX-7 - 12AT turbo JDM
I would imagine there is some finacial influencing going on :)
Natural Gas engines produce a bit more torque than regular gas engines, plus it's a more green fuel. A lot of farm tractor manufacturers offered Natural Gas versions as a less expensive alternative to their diesel models.Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFO
The Wankel isn't known for having very good economy and has always suffered from low torque, which is why it's pretty much never been seen in the 4X4 world.
Ok, but taking 8 hours to half way fill up your car is rediculas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Black
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...atgascar_x.htm
Still they were comparing a 3.5L 215 HP gasoline engine to a 1.4L 148 HP natural gas. Therefore I thought the comparison to a 1.3L 135 HP Wankel Rotary NA Engine was a more equal comparison.
And if natural gas is so good why does the VW need both a super charger and and turbo to get a meesly 148 HP?
Naturally aspirated Rotarys yes, supercharged no. My 12AT 1.2L makes 200HP with 200 Ft/lbs of torque. A little off from our VX's 215HP 230 Ft/lbs of torque, but close considering it is a small turbo running 8 psi boost.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Black
Well, you have to admit that the kind of power they're getting out of a 1400cc engine is impressive and much of that's due to all that forced induction. The supercharger gives your low-end grunt while the turbo more or less provides pressure equalization from what I've seen of the VW trend with this set up.
Natural Gas set ups have different fills, so not all take that long to top the tank. The system listed in the article you linked is for the homeowner to use overnight and works on standard household gas-line pressure. Fill stations have much different equipment. From your article:
We have a lot of local citrus growers that have converted many of their trucks (regular pickups) to LP and NG as it keeps the thieves at bay. They fill pretty quick, usually about 10 minutes and they've got sizeable tanks.Quote:
Filling stations that dispense compressed natural gas under pressure can fill a tank in three to five minutes.
No doubt you can build torque with a Wankel, but this isn't what we've seen in most of the production rotaries. And at that you absolutely have to pressurize the engine. I've ran two RX-4's and have a 20B slated for use as the engine on a future homebuilt aircraft, which will be turbo-normalized.
technically speaking the 12a isnt considered 1.2, more like a 2.4L. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by JAFO
btw joe_black, u got any 20bs for sale? :eek: :eek:
Nope, but Australia is a good source with crate engines running around $4K - $5K last I checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by MZ-N10