Back to gun rights

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,...est=latestnews

Anyone else see this update on a story. Seems a bunch of soccer moms werre offended when a women lawfully and in full view wore a sidearm to a game. The hens all complained and the local sheriff abused his authority and took away the womans right to carry because she created a disturbance by following the law. Well she has now been murdered. I hope her family sues the ^&%$ out of teh town and the sheriff.

This also should make clear to all the people who say we do not need citizens to own guns the police are here to protect us. Well the police got this women killed. They are as responsible for this womans murder as the dirtbag who pulled the trigger. And to those that would say well if we didnt have guns the person could not have murdered her. I say I dount a murderer who ignores the law against murder would be that concerned about breaking the law about owning an illegal gun.

How in the wide world of sports do you figure the police are responsible for this woman's death? Did you even read the story you linked to?

Yeah after reading the story it seems the lady was shot by her husband, with one of their own guns, that they owned legally. The only thing the police were responsible for was taking her gun from her and causing her public disgrace for not really concealing her gun at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZEUS

How in the wide world of sports.....

---

On a side note.....that phrase is hillarious!

circmand,
This is exactly how right wing and left wing do things. They will put a spin on something that makes no sense. The idea is to get the thought out there and maybe it will take hold.

Thanks to the members who are not followers.

Peace.
Tom

p.s.
I bet I know who you voted for. lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZEUS

How in the wide world of sports do you figure the police are responsible for this woman's death? Did you even read the story you linked to?

---

Maybe circ thought she was unarmed because the sherriff took away her weapon, but clearly the article says:

"Wright said more than one weapon was recovered from the home."

Seems more likely to me that the husband caught her doing something less than virtuous with her online "friend" and gunned her down in the heat of the moment. (I think those details were updated since the link was first posted.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomdietrying

circmand,
p.s.
I bet I know who you voted for. lol

---

Seriously? The responsibility lies with a vote, that really doesn't matter anyway due to how the electoral system works anyway? Would a Republican in the big chair have made that difference?

I don't know... maybe if.... IF... from a grass roots level we all decided to be responsible for ourselves instead us as a society, keep VOTING our rights away and asking big brother to take care of us....


maybe

if



Yeah. Probably not.

You did not read the whole story, she got her permit back. So at the time of her death she had her permit. I have a permit to carry a concealed weapon. She was not carrying it concealed. And to a kids soccer game. She did not have to carry it the way she did , concealed yes ,not concealed No. shawn

if your going to talk about something controversial, know your facts first.....

same problem you had in our camera/'cops' discussion

craiger34,
You didn't get it did you?
Peace.
Tom

p.s.
I bet I know who you voted for too. lol

1 she had the gun legally in a holster withis easy reach
2 the cops abused their authority and pulled her permit because a few women could not deal with the site of a gun
3 a judge legally gave her back her gun and permit but verbally assaulted her for what was 100% legal\
4. she then felt the need to hid e her gun in her back pack instead of having it in her holster as is 100% legal
5. when her husband murdered her the gun was stuffed in her back pack and unavailable as opposed to on her hip in the holster.
6. apparently gun rights opponents can see imaginary cheating over a computer as a reason for the husband to murder his wife but can not see this woman had a need to have a gun immediately accesable to her.
7. tha fact that she was murdered and the police who abused their authority wrere no where around is proof she needed her weapon immediately available and the cops are useless

hey circ, do you know the laws in Pa??

what may be legal in your state changes per state....

:flame:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by circmand

1 she had the gun legally in a holster withis easy reach
2 the cops abused their authority and pulled her permit because a few women could not deal with the site of a gun
3 a judge legally gave her back her gun and permit but verbally assaulted her for what was 100% legal\
4. she then felt the need to hid e her gun in her back pack instead of having it in her holster as is 100% legal
5. when her husband murdered her the gun was stuffed in her back pack and unavailable as opposed to on her hip in the holster.
6. apparently gun rights opponents can see imaginary cheating over a computer as a reason for the husband to murder his wife but can not see this woman had a need to have a gun immediately accesable to her.
7. tha fact that she was murdered and the police who abused their authority wrere no where around is proof she needed her weapon immediately available and the cops are useless

---

Her husband shot her while she was in her home on her computer. She was in her home. If you did not understand the first time. I doubt the judge told her not to wear the gun concealed in her home. From what I read her husband walked up behind her and shot her, in her home. I would guess the gun was not on her because she was in her home. This did not happen at the soccer game. She would not have had time to draw her gun and shoot her husband. I get from what you have been complaining about is that you hate cops? Cops are useless? There should be no cops? Is that what you are trying to say? Because thats what it sounds like to me. And you keep ssstttrrreeeccchhhiiinnnggg the truth to make cops look bad. This is a free country I have rights to do whatever I want ,is that what you think? You have the right to do what you want as long as you do not break any laws doing it. If you break the laws and get caught there are consequences. Most adults know this, and they also take responsibility for there actions. IT IN NO WAY WAS THE COP OR JUDGES FAULT SHE WAS KILLED GET OVER IT!!!!! AND IT IS NOT THE COPS FAULT WHEN YOU ARE SPEEDING AND GET A TICKET EITHER!!!! shawn

I didn't know cops were omnipresent and/or psychic? Clearly having these superpowers and not using them to battle evil is reckless and they should be ashamed of themselves. In a country with a divorce rate of 50% they totally should have responded in time.

What an insane argument lol.